|
||||
=Things To Remember=
=Processor=
There are basically only 2 brands to pick here, Intel or AMD.
As for the models, we have a couple of choices on both brands. We have these desktop models (jurassic models not included) for
Intel sorted in terms of performance (slowest to fastest with the same clock speed) and most probably in price as well (cheapest
to u know what):
-P4 Extreme
-P4 Northwood HT
-P4 Prescott HT
-P4 non-HT
-Celeron D
-Celeron
As for AMD:
-A64 FX
-A64
-XP Barton
-XP / Palomino / T-bred
-Sempron
-Duron
There are actually more models for both brands if we will
go into detail. but those models are basically the only models that IMO u should know about. You can always visit their site
(www.intel.com and www.amd.com) if u want to find out more about their models or dive deeper with
their specs.
Clock Speed:
Its the "x.xx mhz" indicated after the brand/model on the
processor. AMD does things differently though, their "xxxx+" is not the actual mhz/ghz rating of
their processor. It's a PR (Performance Rating) of their processors in comparison with their Intel
counterparts (ex: AXP 2000+ is more or less the same as an Intel 2ghz in terms of performance). This helps reduce the confusion
that (for ex) an AMD 1.67ghz is slower than a P4 2ghz. U see, AMD processors can do more work per
clock cycle. So an AMD processor with a lower clock speed can outperform or perform as well (unless the diff is to huge) an
Intel processor with the same or almost the same clock speed.
So what clock speed should u pick? Well it depends on what
apps, softwares, or games u want to run. Of course the faster, the better ... that is if u have the money to burn. These are
IMO what u should at least get:
-1ghz (-):
for peeps who only do word processing, web browsing, or listening to music while doing the mentioned stuffs.
-1.5ghz / 1500+ (-):
for folks who are non-hardcore gamers and want to do more things like basic photo and video editing.
-2ghz / 2000+ (-):
for casual gamers who does multimedia editing quite often.
-2.5ghz / 2500+ (-): for semi-hardcore gamers and folks who are semi-pro multimedia
editors.
-3ghz / 3000+ (+/-): for hardcore gamers, multimedia editing pros, and heavy multi-taskers.
(-) = or slower
(+) = or faster
As for what brand u should pick? Check out my "Misc. Stuffs"
section for more info.
=Motherboard=
There are only a few things that u have to take note when buying a mobo besides
the obvious that it should support ur processor of choice (its easy, juz ask the salesperson). Probably the most important
thing to look for is the "chipset", though a word processing or net surfing only system could probably juz ignore this one,
folks want to have an additional boost by purchasing 2pcs of RAM with the same size might want to consider an NForce 2 chipset
equipped motherboard. "VIA" is a pretty good if u for some reason u are not able to purchase an NF2 mobo (NForce 2 MOtherBOard).
"SiS" can also be considered especially if ur quite tight on ur budget.
The number of available slots, ports, etc should also be considered and even counted
(especially if ur planning on purchasing lots of PCI add-on cards in the future). The mobo can also often times support newer
processors via BIOS update, so there's going to be a room for future processor upgrade/s. Don't expect ur 2-3yr old mobo to
support the 'just released' processors though.
=Memory / RAM=
When buying RAM, there are 3 things IMO that u should take
note of. The most important thing IMO is the amount, followed by its speed and type (thats the PCxxxx or SDR/DDRxxx that
u see besides the RAM brand on pricelists), and lastly the brand.
U can follow my estimated amount depending on the system's type of usage:
-128mb: should be the bare minimum for folks with extremely
tight budget and will only do word processing or light net browsing. I wouldn't recommend using WinXP as an OS though, use
Win98se or Win2k instead (skip WinME).
-256mb: the minimum for WinXP regardless of the apps
or games that u will use/play. Non-hardcore Win98se or Win2k users (might it be gaming, multimedia editing) can most probably
survive with this amount w/ little noticeable system sluggishness. Tweaking WinXP (I also have a guide here, look it up) will
help increase performance.
-384mb/512mb: Recommended for folks who plays newer
games under any OS, non-pro video/audio editing can run w/ this amount of memory w/ minor to zero performance probs.
-768mb and above: Recommended for hardcore gamers, video/audio
editing buffs, heavy multitaskers etc.
Gamers, take note that not all games require huge amount of RAM. Some benefit greatly
from having lots of RAM (above 512mb) than having a fast videocard or processor. While some will do just fine with 384mb as
long as u have a fast videocard and/or processor. "Balance" is still the key here.
The speed on the other hand can be a bit confusing at first. To make it simple,
check ur mobo's manual ... the list of supported RAM speeds is listed there. It is recommended that u buy the fastest RAM
that ur mobo supports. But if price is going to be a problem, a slower memory will suffice. Just remember that more RAM is
better than having faster but less amount of RAM (unless u have lots already).
As for the branded or generic issue, check my Misc. Stuffs section for more info.
=Videocard=
Good thing this is a non-techie article, 'coz if not ... this videocard issue will
probably be longer than the rest of the other hardware articles combined ... lol! Anyway ...
Non gamers will probably be able to do fine with an "onboard" video (built-in to
the mobo). An onboard video has a drawback though, if ur a gamer ... IMO u should not even consider buying a PC with an onboard
only video. 'Coz not only will it run games using the powerpoint (slideshow) engine (its an analogy ok? ahehe!), it will also
use up some part of ur physical memory (RAM, 'coz built-in video doesn't have their own memory)
that will slow games even more (unless u have tons of RAM).
Now if ur going to consider an "add-on" type of videocard, try to think of the
type or game titles that u plan on playing, what resolution and details setting, are u willing to play a game and sacrifice
eye-candy in exchange for better performance etc etc? Once ur done with that, here are a couple of things that u should take
note when choosing the right vidcard for u:
-As always budget dictates how good or bad ur soon to be purchased videocard will
be. Try to extend ur budget as much as u can for future-proofing and in exchange for better videocard performance ... and
not for a much expensive brand.
-In gaming, there's DX and OpenGL compliance written on the box. What are they
for? Well newer versions gives u better graphics quality. Most newer games today already supports the latest DX and OpenGL
versions and videocards that supports them via hardware will be able to produce the enchanced graphics better or faster than
those videocard that only run 'em via emulation. Remember that there's a difference between a DX9 "compatible" and a DX9 "compliant"
videocard (or any DX version for that matter). DX9 compatible videocards only supports the version via driver/emulation w/c
can cause performance and graphics degration. Compliance on the other hand doesn't have those downsides b'coz it supports
the said version via hardware. There are games that requires a specific DX version compliance,
some will either run the game with emulated procedures or disable specific DX features if ur videocard doesn't support it
(non-compliant but compatible).
-Now how would u know if a videocard is fast enough for ur needs? Some measure
it via the specs on the box but IMO it is best to read reviews regarding a specific type of videocard in comparison with the
rest of the pack. The amount of memory also do not dictate its performance, it does help but there are times where a videocard
with half the amount of memory can outperform a videocard with twice its memory.
-How about the extra features? What should u guys look for? Well it again depends
on ur needs. Most videocards now have a TV-Out socket, some comes with a DVI support (for digital panels), the rest may have
an RCA-in for video capturing etc etc. All of those will of course have an effect on the price, so don't buy a videocard with
a sky-rocketing price juz b'coz it has lots of features if ur not really going to use 'em.
-If ur into video editing, well that's another story. U will need a "capture card" for
that. I am quite new to that field myself, but I'm already planning on starting a basic video editing section. Watch out for
that!
=Soundcard=
I was asked a couple of months ago by a PC related website to create an article
about purchasing soundcards. But months passed and up to now I can't find my article anywhere on their website. I dunno if
they posted it somewhere else and took the credit, no worries though ... its hot in hell anyway.
I still have the copy of my article in a .doc file format though. It's not written
with newbies in mind but it is still a non-techie article so even those who doesn't know anything regarding soundcards will
still be able to understand the article. Its pretty long (6 pages) so I suggest that u just dl it. It talks about different
types, models, features of soundcards. Their strengths and weaknesses, price range, and also talks a bit about ur current
or targeted speaker setup.
Last Updated: 083004
|
||||
|
||||