Misc. Tweaks/Tips/Info's

Home | Windows Tweaking Guides | Games Tweaking Guides | NVIDIA Tweaking Guides | Audio Tweaking Guides | Computer Jargons | PC Building Guide | Tech News | BIOS Tweaking Part I | BIOS Tweaking Part II | Case Mod And Cooling | Reviews | Things To Do | Misc. Stuff | PC Protection and Maintenance | Troubleshooting Guide | Rants | Help Push | Pushy's System Specs | Top Downloads | FAQ's & STC's | What's New? | Sign my Guestbook | Links

This is the section where I'm goin to add my misc. tips, tweaks, info's and/or recommendations that isn't related to my previous sections. I have already announced this section to be included in my site a couple of months ago. But since I'm the only guy updating/editing this site, and at the same time busy doin some other stuffs, it's only now that I was able to finally open up this section. This page will be constantly updated, I already forgotten some of the stuffs that I was supposed to add here ahehe! But I'll add 'em as soon as I remember 'em, granted of course that I have the time.

=Epson Ink Cartridge Utility=
I found this one while browsing a Filipino msg board. This utility does a couple of nifty stuffs like a head cleaning utility that only cleans black or color ink instead of cleaning both the cartridges at the same time (saves ink). It can also reset the ink's chipset when the meter is already at "zero" w/c will often times enable u to print a couple of more pages (saves money) etc etc.
=Gamepad on a Budget=
Buying urself a gamepad is really easy if u have lots of money to burn. But when its the other way around, then here are a couple of tips that makes deciding as to what brand and model of gamepad to buy a lil bit easier:
What features are u lookin' for?
Single, Dual or No Analog Stick: If ur gonna ask me, I highly recommend getting at least a gamepad with an Analog stick. Grabbing a gamepad with an analog stick greatly extends a pad's usability. Not only will u be able to use it with games that is better when played using the d-pad (eg. fighting games) but also enable u to play games that is better when played using a stick (eg. racing, adventure, sports games etc). The decision as to whether or not u should consider buying a gamepad with a dual-analog stick totally depends on the games u play. Most EA Sports games like NBA Live and NHL series uses the right-analog stick to perform moves that is "sometimes" cannot be performed using only a keyboard or a gamepad w/o a right-analog stick.  As for the rest of the games, the right-analog is used to move the cursor (juz like what a mouse does) w/c is IMO should not be the main reason for buying a gamepad with a dual-stick 'coz a keyb/mouse combo is better used for those kind of games.
Vibration Effects: If u prefer to play games with vibration effects, then by all means grab urself a gamepad with the said feature. But IMHO, the additional price caused by this feature that ... (again IMO) doesn't make the game realistic (since its non-directional and juz vibrates the gamepad) is not worth it.
Shape: Comfort should also be a part of ur consideration when ur looking for a good gamepad. The shape of the gamepad plays a role on how long u can use it w/o straining urself that could sometimes lead to injuries. Most of the well known brands (eg. MS and Logitech) right now have done a good job of creating a gamepad that is shaped for better comfort.
Brand and Support: I have only used MS and Logitech gamepads/joysticks, so I cannot comment on the other brands. But between MS and Logitech? Logitech has by far better tech and driver support. MS controllers sometimes doesn't have their drivers posted on MS's website, some of 'em cannot properly work with newer systems and MS does a poor job of releasing a patch or fix. If I'm gonna rate their driver support from 1-10 (10 is the highest) ... I'm gonna give them a -1 (yes that's a negative 1). So if ur having a dilemma as to w/c brand to pick, do urself a favor and grab urself a Logitech gamepad instead. Take note however that Logitech's D-pad is somewhat hard to use.
The Looks: The aestethic part of the gamepad should be the least of ur problem. Although it does sometimes help ur system look better when u have a cool looking gamepad sitting beside it, the features and support should be ur main focus. A good example is Logitech's Action (single-analog) and Rumblepad (dual-analog w/ rumble effects). The Action pad, although lacking the right-analog stick ang vibration effects looks a lot better than the more expensive but more functional Rumblepad. The Action pad is colored black, with a navy blue d-pad and stick, rounded buttons plus a glossy black plastic coating on the bottom part of the gamepad. Compare that with the Rumblepad that is gray in color, light blue d-pad and stick, with smaller buttons and no glossy coating ... its obvious that the Action pad wins the Aestethic crown. But its a gamepad, not a decoration for ur PC. So if u have the money, would u really go for a better looking gamepad than a pad that has more features? Its a no brainer really.
=Picking up a Better Videocard=
The only tip I can give u here is this: DO NOT sacrifice raw power for DX9 support.
=Webcam for the Masses=

Picking up the right webcam for ur needs is pretty easy. If u have a tight budget and can only afford a CMOS sensor (has problem with low light, color accuracy is not all good) webcam then grab urself a Creative webcam instead of Logitech. CMOS based Logitech webcams have very poor video quality, everything is greenish with that webcam. Skin tone accuracy is bad as well. Of course u can tweak the colors with its driver/software but u still can't compare it with a webcam that can produce better looking and more accurate colors by "default".
If u can afford a CCD sensor (very good color accuracy in almost any lighting condition) webcam then Logitech is a very good option. Its price/performance ratio compared to other products is very good (specially their cheaper CCD webcam models). But if u can still can find Intel CCD webcams (w/c is very hard to find nowadays since they already stopped manufacturing) and can afford it, then consider buying them instead. Intel CCD webcams have richer colors compared to Logitech. As for Creative CCD's? I haven't seen one yet, so I cannot comment on 'em, a bigger percentage of user reviews tend lean more on the positive side though.
=Top Quality CD-R/RW's (media)=
If ur looking for a cd-r/rw media that will last u a long time then Taiyo Yuden and Mitsubishi products are the companies that u should focus more on.
But if u don't have time checking out the manufacturer and juz want a specific brand, well I highly recommend the ff: TDK, Pioneer, Sony (Japan), and Imation.
=Optical Mouse Confusion=
I've noticed that quite a lot of people are having a hard time figuring out  why some optical mouse costs more than others when they look exactly the same.
U guys have to remember that even though most single-optical (800dpi under NT based OS / 400-600dpi under Win9x) mouse looks the same, some of 'em have enhancements that makes the mouse more accurate than others. Higher models tend to be more accurate than the cheaper ones and have less lag. There are also dual-optical mouse that is said to give u twice the accuracy of a single analog mouse.
As for the brand? MS is well known for producing good quality/performing mouse. But IMO Logitech gives u better value for money. The decision is urs to make though.
=RAM (Generic or Branded?)=
The answer here is pretty simple. If u have any plans of overclocking ur system or setting ur memory to aggressive settings/timings, then branded mem is the way to go. Otherwise, a generic brand can serve u as good as a branded mem (well most of the time).

=CRT / LCD monitor=
IMO, if ur out in the market looking for a monitor that performs well on both games and apps, CRT monitors is the way to go. Not only is it A LOT cheaper than LCD monitors, but it can handle resolutions higher than most LCD monitors that cost 5 times more. Yes it eats up more power and LCD screens tend to be more gentle on the eyes (in terms of eye strain) but IMO that still doesn't justify its sky rocketing cost. But if ur in the market lookin for a cool (aesthetically speaking) monitor and have the money to burn then an LCD monitor is obviously the way to go.
=AMD / Intel processor=
There's always this endless debate regarding w/c processor is better. IMO, it depends on 2 things ... ur budget, and what u intend to do with ur computer. If money is not a prob, then go ahead with the fastest Intel or AMD processor. But if it is (like for the most of us), then its a much better idea to use an AMD processor (unless u can find a better performing Intel processor with a lower price tag), since its cheaper (some of its models are that is) w/c will give u more out of ur budget.
The most common mistake that a consumer does is he/she's goin to buy him/herself an Intel processor then skimp on the amount of RAM, videocard, soundcard, mobo etc. That is not ... NOT ... the way to go. The processor alone cannot make ur soundcard produce high-quality sounds, or make ur games run faster and/or look better. Remember that an Intel system with crappy vid/soundcard and low amount of RAM will NEVER outperform an AMD system with good quality parts. Never sacrifice the other parts of ur system juz to be able to buy urself an Intel processor.
Be reminded however that if ur into media encoding, Intel should be ur processor of choice.
=Recommended Burn Speed for CD-R's=
The ff. speed recommendations decreases the chances of having a bad copy (eg. stuttering audio for cda's etc) of media and/or better compatibility with media players.
Audio CD = 4x - 12x
Videos = 16x - 24x
Files = not much of an issue what speed u choose here
=Photo Printers=
Photo printers has been around for a long time already, but up to now there are still photo printers that claim to have excellent quality but fails to deliver. Here are some things to look for when looking for a photo printer:
Number of Colors: most photo printers nowadays comes with at least 4 color ink tanks. The rest may come with more colors that helps in producing more accurate looking photos but bear in mind that the number of colors doesn't always guarantee that the printer will produce excellent looking prints.
Dpi (Dots Per Inch): if ur in a tight budget, a photo printer with a maximum of 720x720dpi support will probably suffice. It will probably be enough for most peeps (me included) b'coz as long as the printer quality is high, the difference between a photo studio printed pic and a printer produced pic will be hardly (if at all) noticeable.
Droplet Size: a droplet size of 4pl (picoliters) should be good enough for a photo printer since pictures doesn't need smaller drop sizes b'coz it often times print solid areas. A smaller droplet size will result on a smoother text printing. Some printers have variable droplet sizes w/c automatically uses the appropriate droplet size for the task at hand.
Separate Ink Tanks: this feature helps save money by not forcing the user to buy a completely new ink cartridge when only one color gets used up. The user will have the option to buy only the ink tank that ran low on ink.
Borderless Printing: self explanatory
PIM support: Print Image Matching support makes the PIM embedded picture file to come out ur printer as close to the original source as possible w/o any aid of photo editors. Only Epson printers and a chosen digicam brand/models have support for the said feature.
Brand: when looking for a respectable photo printer, Epson Photo and high-end Canon models is a good place to start.

Last Updated: 032404